About Us

Name: Ed Lilly
Biography
Name: Disgruntled in NY
Email: disgruntled.blogger1@gmail.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Is Barack Obama more popular than high school basketball in Indiana?

Senator Barack Obama will be campaigning in my hometown today.  Actually, there's probably a little bit of a dispute on that point, as he will be appearing at Concord High School's gymnasium, which I think is technically not located in the City of Elkhart.  The Concord school system is separate from the Elkhart school system, and I don't think all of the land in the Concord area has been annexed into the city.  In any event, the news stories are indicating that Sen. Obama is in Elkhart, so we'll all go along with that characterization for now.

As for the appearance itself, Sen. Obama will be at McCuen Gymnasium.  In talking to my father, I understand the gym hold about 1,000 people.  This would be a nice little rally in a town of about 45,000.

But Sen. Obama could have had a rally in an even bigger venue in Elkhart.  North Side Gym holds approximately 7,000 people.  This gym was built in 1954 and I believe it was one of the largest gyms in the state for high school basketball for a long time.  The gym is actually located at one of the junior high schools (now called middle schools) in town, and both of the Elkhart high schools play their home basketball games there.  As a young kid in the 1970s, I remember going to games on Friday and Saturday nights and the gym would be full.  For sectional and regional games when the state basketball tourney started, the gym would be overflowing, and I can remember sitting in cramped corner bleachers in the upper level for many games, feeling like the whole gym would collapse under the stomping feet of the crowd.

Things have changed over the years with high school hoops in Indiana.  It's now been over 10 years since a single team was crowned THE state champs at the end of the tournament.  Now there are four class champions, depending on the size of the schools.  There will never be another Milan Miracle, upon which the movie "Hoosiers" was loosely based.

And the crowds at Elkhart high school games are not what they used to be.  I went to some of the games when I still lived in town after law school.  North Side Gym was nowhere near full.  A lot of the bleachers in the upper level weren't even rolled out for use.

I'm a little surprised that Sen. Obama apparently could not muster enough excitement in his campaign appearance to at least match the crowds at North Side Gym that I remember.  I'm sure his campaign staff would not want to have him speak in a quarter full gym in a small town in Indiana.  It wouldn't make for very good pictures.  So the smaller venue at the newer school out in the suburbs will probably be just fine.  It will be full with a cheering crowd, like it was when Sean Kemp played for Concord almost 20 years ago.  I wonder if Kemp's name will come up in today's events?  He's probably the most famous athlete to have attended the Concord schools.  If someone on the campaign staff did their homework, it may not be a bad reference to make, at least to try to connect with local celebrity and former glory.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can anyone reconcile these two bumper stickers?

Here in New Jersey, I typically see a lot of Obama lawn signs and bumper stickers.  But in the Target parking lot this morning, I was actually stopped in my tracks by the two bumper stickers on the car parked across the aisle from mine.  The bumper sticker on the right hand side of the car was a standard Obama '08 model.  But on the left was a bumper sticker that read:

Work Harder!
Millions on Welfare are
Depending on You!

I still have no clue how these two bumper stickers go together on the same car.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So who joined Trinity United Church first? And will it matter?

The big news from last night appears to be Sen. Obama's decision to leave his radical Chicago church.  Moreover, the news reports indicate that both Sen. Obama and his wife are leaving the controversial church.

I have been unable to find the answer online, but I am mildly curious whether Sen. Obama or his wife joined their church first.  I thought I had read something a while back that indicated Mrs. Obama was either the first of the couple to join the church, or it could have been that she was the prime reason they stayed in that particular church.

My interest in this question was prompted by several comments I have seen on the web about how Sen. Obama's willingness to cast aside anyone who creates problems for his political ambition, as now shown by his defenestration of his entire church congregation, may cause those close to Sen. Obama to become a bit nervous at wondering when their time will come to be sacrificed for his career.

Which made me think of Mrs. Obama, and how I really do not want a replay of the Clinton years with questions of what the "real" nature of the President and First Lady's marriage happens to be.

How could the church resignation bring up such a thought?  Well, as I queried at the outset, I was wondering if Sen. Obama or his wife joined the church first.  If Mrs. Obama became a member of the church before her husband, or if she was the primary reason the family stayed in that church, then it raises the possibility that Sen. Obama's political necessity of resigning from the church could create a division in his marriage.  By forcing his wife to leave her chosen church, he may have partially dealt with one problem, yet created another in the form of speculation about whether Mrs. Obama will leave over church/religious and other disagreements.  After 8 years of hearing about how the Clintons had a "sham" marriage that was really just a business arrangement, I have no real desire for a replay with the Obamas, with Mrs. Obama in the role of the wronged spouse, forced to leave the church she loved, who simply has to take whatever grief her more powerful husband gives her so that she can maintain her proximity to power.

I hope that all this speculation is needless.  But if anyone has a clue on the answer to which of the Obamas joined their church first, I'd love to check out the citation.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Language and logic on the campaign trail

I heard some of Dennis Prager's radio show yesterday while I was in the car, and loved the "campaign promise" that he made.  Prager was playing clips of Senator Clinton lying [ed. - forgot the strikethrough before, oops] speaking about the pregnant woman / denial of health care story, during which Clinton made some reference to the woman in the story, "havin' some trouble."

Prager picked up on the use of "havin'" in the story, noting that politicians often use little tropes like that in speaking to audiences, trying to get people to identify with them.  As Prager noted, Mrs. Clinton went to Yale law school, and uses the word "having" when she speaks.

Chuckling about such absurdity in speaking, Prager promised that, in the event he ever runs for office, he will use the letter "g" when he speaks.  It's a great observation and a great "promise."

Which brings me to the story on Senator Obama's talk about his patriotism.  Jules Crittenden linked to this story in the Boston Herald, which provides Obama's statement in relevant part:


“I love this country not because it’s perfect, but because we’ve always been able to move it closer to perfection,”

A lot of people have written about how wonderful Obama is as a speaker, and I guess I'll take their word for it.  I think the last speech or address by a politician that I listened to was President Bush's address either immediately after 9/11, or his State of the Union address the following January.

What prompts me to instantly dislike Obama's statement is the false dichotomy that he, and so many politicians, sets up.  I don't love this country because it's perfect either, and I don't think anyone has seriously tried to argue that it is a perfect country.  But this country stands for the right things.  Freedom.  Opportunity.  The notion of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" was not just thrown in on a whim by the Founding Fathers.

That doesn't mean everything that has ever happened here has been perfect, or even right.  But this is still the greatest country, in terms of what it stands for and what it offers to the world's people, in history.

For Senator Obama to talk about silly hypotheticals like "perfection" is ridiculous.  There never has been, nor will there ever be, a perfect country.  Discussion of even moving it closer to perfection is something I would expect from a high school sophomore on the debate team.  This is a great country.  And it bothers me that a presidential candidate who so many praise as a great speaker seems incapable of saying something so obvious and true, and meaning it.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »